Nouvelle juge à la Cour du Québec
L'équipe Droit-Inc
2010-04-23 13:24:00
Commenter
La ministre de la Justice et Procureure générale du Québec, Mme Kathleen Weil, annonce la nomination d’une nouvelle juge à la Cour du Québec.
Il s’agit de Mme Lori Renée Weitzman, indique le communiqué du ministère de la Justice.
Celle-ci exercera principalement ses fonctions à la chambre criminelle et pénale à Montréal.
Mme Lori Renée Weitzman est détentrice d'un baccalauréat en droit civil (B.C.L.) et d'un baccalauréat en droit (LL.B.) de l'Université McGill ainsi que d'un «Master of International Affairs (M.I.A.)» de l'Université Columbia de New York.
Elle a été admise au Barreau de New York en 1986 et au Barreau du
Québec en 1987. Elle a commencé sa carrière au sein du cabinet White & Case à New York. Depuis 1987, elle était procureure aux poursuites criminelles et pénales.
Le communiqué ne précise pas si Mme Weil a demandé conseil auprès de Jean Charest avant de nommer Mme Weitzman à cette fonction.
Celle-ci exercera principalement ses fonctions à la chambre criminelle et pénale à Montréal.
Mme Lori Renée Weitzman est détentrice d'un baccalauréat en droit civil (B.C.L.) et d'un baccalauréat en droit (LL.B.) de l'Université McGill ainsi que d'un «Master of International Affairs (M.I.A.)» de l'Université Columbia de New York.
Elle a été admise au Barreau de New York en 1986 et au Barreau du
Québec en 1987. Elle a commencé sa carrière au sein du cabinet White & Case à New York. Depuis 1987, elle était procureure aux poursuites criminelles et pénales.
Le communiqué ne précise pas si Mme Weil a demandé conseil auprès de Jean Charest avant de nommer Mme Weitzman à cette fonction.
Partager cet article:
Gmail
Outlook
facultatif
il y a 15 ans> I can barely imagine how stupid one must be to draw conclusions about one's behaviour in society based on a series of blog comments...
actually, you ought to be rather capable of imagining such stupidity, as you are a quintessential example of it: you regularly draw conclusions about people's behaviour in society based on what is sometimes one, single comment (as opposed to a series of comments, a healthy and surely representative sampling of which we, in fact, do have as far you are concerned), or, sometimes, based on one's mere use of a sports analogy, or other such trivialities.
You also obviously don't know enough about the case, criminal law, the day-to-day practice of it, and the prosecutor's role and powers if you think that the treatment of Guy Lafleur was somethnig over which the said prosecutor does not have any control.
you should stick to lecturing people on IP, civil liability, family law, secured transactions, contarcts, common law, roman law, napoleanic law, civil procedure, ethics, history, biology, medicine, religion, middle-eastern politics, the inner funcionings of the Bar and government, french grammar, marketing strategies, web site design, labour law, bankruptcy law, and, why not, the history of post-colonial anthropology.
Anonyme
il y a 15 ansFacultatif: you also forgot to mention the fact that Me is an expert and also lectures people with respect to a subject very close to his heart: what it means to be an unreformed barbarian.
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>> You also obviously don't know enough about the case, criminal law, the day-to-day practice of it, and the prosecutor's role and powers if you think that the treatment of Guy Lafleur was somethnig over which the said prosecutor does not have any control.
Weitzman wasn't part of the arrest warrant authorization. Just called to congratulate, so I know. She prosecuted him, which was a fair trial. Not a witch-hunt.
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>> you regularly draw conclusions about people's behaviour in society based on what is sometimes one, single comment
Never did that. Show me proof.