Nouvelle juge à la Cour du Québec

L'équipe Droit-Inc
2010-04-23 13:24:00
Celle-ci exercera principalement ses fonctions à la chambre criminelle et pénale à Montréal.
Mme Lori Renée Weitzman est détentrice d'un baccalauréat en droit civil (B.C.L.) et d'un baccalauréat en droit (LL.B.) de l'Université McGill ainsi que d'un «Master of International Affairs (M.I.A.)» de l'Université Columbia de New York.
Elle a été admise au Barreau de New York en 1986 et au Barreau du
Québec en 1987. Elle a commencé sa carrière au sein du cabinet White & Case à New York. Depuis 1987, elle était procureure aux poursuites criminelles et pénales.
Le communiqué ne précise pas si Mme Weil a demandé conseil auprès de Jean Charest avant de nommer Mme Weitzman à cette fonction.
Anonyme
il y a 15 ans"Le communiqué ne précise pas si Mme Weil a demandé conseil auprès de Jean Charest avant de nommer Mme Weitzman à cette fonction"
Bonne!
Anonyme
il y a 15 ansSon parcours est vraiment impressionnant...
Anonyme
il y a 15 ans>>>> Son parcours est vraiment impressionnant...
bof...
Le C.V. est très très short.
Me
il y a 15 ansFélicitations à Me Peter Kalichman pour la nomination de son épouse.
Me
il y a 15 ansFélicitations aussi à Sophie, Jacob, Daniel et David pour la nomination de leur maman.
anonyme
il y a 15 ansLe cabinet de Kalichman a representé le Parti libéral du Canada à Commission Gomery.
Anonyme
il y a 15 ans> Le cabinet de Kalichman a representé le Parti libéral du Canada à Commission Gomery.
Non dis-moi pas ça!!! Serait-ce possible qu'il s'agisse encore d'une petite nomination entre petits zamis du Parti libéral...
facultatif
il y a 15 ansIsn’t she the one who disgustingly triggered a witch-hunt against Guy Lafleur, in a petty display of overzealousness? I could be wrong, but please confirm.
Re: her union to Me Kalichman:
Me: for such a high-class guy, possessed, as you are, with such disdain towards the lower strata of society, you seem to be quite the gossipy type. and you seem to enjoy taking every opportunity to flaunt this characteristic of yours, which, in fact (more than a love for hockey) is the hallmark of classless people.
7up
il y a 15 ansMe aime aussi tout ce qui touche à la communauté juive dont il fait sûrement partie... en plus de n'avoir rien à faire de ses journées comme en font foi ses nombreux commentaires ici.
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>>>>> Isn’t she the one who disgustingly triggered a witch-hunt against Guy Lafleur, in a petty display of overzealousness? I could be wrong, but please confirm.
She prosecuted Guy Lafleur.
The which-hunt most likely refers to the arrest. For your own information, the warrant starts with a policeman and a judge. Afterward it is executed (poorly, as it was) by a policeman. Where the heck do you see a crown prosecutor into that? What tells you that the crown prosecutor of the subsequent trial had something to do in the warrant affair?
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>> Me: for such a high-class guy, possessed, as you are, with such disdain towards the lower strata of society, you seem to be quite the gossipy type. and you seem to enjoy taking every opportunity to flaunt this characteristic of yours, which, in fact (more than a love for hockey) is the hallmark of classless people.
I can barely imagine how stupid one must be to draw conclusions about one's behaviour in society based on a series of blog comments...
facultatif
il y a 15 ans> I can barely imagine how stupid one must be to draw conclusions about one's behaviour in society based on a series of blog comments...
actually, you ought to be rather capable of imagining such stupidity, as you are a quintessential example of it: you regularly draw conclusions about people's behaviour in society based on what is sometimes one, single comment (as opposed to a series of comments, a healthy and surely representative sampling of which we, in fact, do have as far you are concerned), or, sometimes, based on one's mere use of a sports analogy, or other such trivialities.
You also obviously don't know enough about the case, criminal law, the day-to-day practice of it, and the prosecutor's role and powers if you think that the treatment of Guy Lafleur was somethnig over which the said prosecutor does not have any control.
you should stick to lecturing people on IP, civil liability, family law, secured transactions, contarcts, common law, roman law, napoleanic law, civil procedure, ethics, history, biology, medicine, religion, middle-eastern politics, the inner funcionings of the Bar and government, french grammar, marketing strategies, web site design, labour law, bankruptcy law, and, why not, the history of post-colonial anthropology.
Anonyme
il y a 15 ansFacultatif: you also forgot to mention the fact that Me is an expert and also lectures people with respect to a subject very close to his heart: what it means to be an unreformed barbarian.
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>> You also obviously don't know enough about the case, criminal law, the day-to-day practice of it, and the prosecutor's role and powers if you think that the treatment of Guy Lafleur was somethnig over which the said prosecutor does not have any control.
Weitzman wasn't part of the arrest warrant authorization. Just called to congratulate, so I know. She prosecuted him, which was a fair trial. Not a witch-hunt.
Me
il y a 15 ans>>>>> you regularly draw conclusions about people's behaviour in society based on what is sometimes one, single comment
Never did that. Show me proof.